cyber punks

Cyberpunks. Thats a name that carries multiple meanings. In this case i refer to our class. I use the johnny mnemonic style cyberpunk. A person living in a world that runs rampant with technology. This monday we had a class online. Despite technological limitations, our free flowing conversation was self-moderated rather effectively.
We were able to tell what was going on by using our prior experience with debate and conversation to insert emotion and innuendo to each others "speech". We were able to tell who was talking to who and even gander a guess at what the response would be. If this were not the case, we would have had a significantly less meaningful conversation. So what happens when these chat rooms start to be used more commonly? What if the class started there, would we be able to even learn those mannerisms, or would our conversations be doomed to stale flatlining question and answer session?

AIM, conversation or hyped up emailing.

One of my friends pointed out to me yesterday that she absolutely hates talking online. I asked why and got the response of the lack of emotion. You cannot tell the little innuendos and sarcasms in human speech. All you see is a flat response. This can lead to a lot of miscommunication. After talking to her and failing to crack some of my favorite "thats what she said" style jokes, I realized that it was indeed true. The only reason people do get some of these intricacies online is their intimate knowledge of the other converser. They know what the person means, or what the person could understand when they speak. This is a similar situation to emails, but going back and forth in real time.

What ever happened to talking on the phone? we discussed the ease that this emotionless environment provides to certain types of speech, but now that cellphones run rampant, what does AIM hold other than multitasking?

console wars?

Has business really won us all over that well? Last year, a "console war" was the headline of many news bulletins in the tech industry. Between products by major manufacturers such as Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo this war was simply a ploy for market share and publicity. We have fallen right in step with their plans. By hyping up the competition between game platforms, an artificial increase in demand allows for guaranteed sales for these companies. All but sony turned a profit in major proportions for the year as well.
Where is the difference between competition over a target market and using hype to dupe people into rushing out to buy overpriced goods. In sellers terms its a beautiful economic trick. For the rest of us, it is a dirty dirty evil thing. On the buyer-to-buyer market, scarcity of resources drove demand and therefore prices sky-high making the xbox 360, ps3, and wii nearly three times their list price during the month after their respective launches. This hyperinflation did not discourage sales. Rather, it hyped up everyone else to keep the demand high above supply levels. The more machines the companies made, the more money they could walk away with. We've all been duped into the newest toy, the shiniest gadget, and the coolest marketing scam.

Many of us are tech junkies in a digital age.

Giving up so soon?

Despite all attempts, the media industry has failed to provide itself with secure methods of making sales. Piracy is at an all time high and the spread of ultra-high-speed internet means that more and more people are able to get anything they want, anytime they want, be it movies, songs, or shows. Media is even available in live streams on many websites such as dailymotion and youtube. A few days ago, the CEO and co-founder of Apple, Steve Jobs, came out and denounced DRM.
DRM is digital rights management code. What it attempts to do is prevent you or me from copying songs without paying money for their permission. The only problem here is that every DRM code released so far be it napster, apple, or windows has been cracked. If you factor this in with the big 5 record companies still selling 90% of their merchandise through CDs which are not DRM encoded, the incentives to pay for research and implementation of a broken system online are not apparent to many, and apparently are no longer apparent to Mr. Jobs. Here you can find his original speech and rationale. It makes little sense for these companies to try and hassle us from stealing online music when we can steal music from CDs anyway. Music is inelastic in its demand, people will buy it whether it is protected or not and people will steal it whether it is protected or not. Abandoning DRM will save money for these companies in impressive quantity and will allow loyal customers the ease of being able to take their music with them and not have to switch between services and devices in order to find a working match.
Is DRM worth it to these companies? What do you think would happen if it was finally thrown out?

shake it like you mean it demonboy

Creepy. Just creepy. What kind of world do we live in that every immature pre-pubescent boy feels the need to run around toting gang slogans, racial slurs, and sexual innuendos on the internet? Oh I know, its the digital world. These kids would normally be reprimanded or not taken seriously in real life, but on the internet, its like a playground. They roam free. The issue I see though is that this attitude is spilling over into the real world. The younger generations are slowly losing respect for one another and following the "baddass rebel" attitude more and more. A generation of white suburbia wishes it were from the ghetto, and those who don't wish they weren't so sad (see: emo kids). When people start realizing that these artificial persona are actually who they are and begin acting that way all the time, chaos will ensue. Hopefully I'll be living on some small island somewhere by then.